Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 6:50:34 GMT -5
Distortion and manipulation, challenges energetic and effective measures to control the occurrence of conduct that violates the democratic rule of law." Forced bar The TSE's decision to maintain the fine imposed against the deputy did not have unanimous support from voters. Arthur Rollo believes that the court did a job in this trial that is the responsibility of the Legislative Branch. "I think the TSE's decision is wrong. The article is specific regarding anonymous electoral propaganda on the internet. I believe that the TSE forced the envelope in applying the fine based on article 57-D", stated Rollo, who also believes that the The law must be changed to effectively punish fake news. "It is up to the legislator to change the legislation to punish fake news, but not to do it this way.
The TSE is legislating in this case." Context In a video shared on his social networks in October last year, Nikolas Ferreira used excerpts from old and decontextualized journalistic texts to accuse Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, then a presidential candidate, of having embezzled R$242.2 billion from healthcare during his mandate previous. Lula's defense managed to remove the material from the air and made a repr Special Phone Number Data esentation asking for the application of article 36 of the Elections Law, which deals with early electoral propaganda. Minister Alexandre de Moraes considered its use unreasonable and decided to classify the conduct in article 57-D of the same law. The rule, included in the Elections Law in 2009, guarantees the free expression of thoughts as long as "anonymity is prohibited during the electoral campaign via the global computer network". Paragraph 2 provides for a fine of R$5,000 to R$30,000.
When deciding to reinterpret the rule, Minister Alexandre argued that the dissemination of fake news, even when carried out by an identified person, has the same harmful effects on the legitimacy of the elections as the demonstration made by an anonymous user. Ministers Ricardo Lewandowski, Cármen Lúcia and Benedito Gonçalves accompanied the rapporteur.Although the special appeal is subject to preliminary ruling before the court of origin, the same does not happen with the appeal filed against the decision not to admit this appeal. Nelson Jr./SCO/STF Minister Joel Ilan Paciornik, rapporteur of the case at the Superior Court of Justice Nelson Jr./SCO/STF Thus, Minister Joel Ilan Paciornik, of the Superior Court of Justice, ordered the referral of a case to the court for the analysis of the admissibility of an appeal in a special appeal and annulled a monocratic decision of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro that had not been acknowledged of such grievance.
The TSE is legislating in this case." Context In a video shared on his social networks in October last year, Nikolas Ferreira used excerpts from old and decontextualized journalistic texts to accuse Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, then a presidential candidate, of having embezzled R$242.2 billion from healthcare during his mandate previous. Lula's defense managed to remove the material from the air and made a repr Special Phone Number Data esentation asking for the application of article 36 of the Elections Law, which deals with early electoral propaganda. Minister Alexandre de Moraes considered its use unreasonable and decided to classify the conduct in article 57-D of the same law. The rule, included in the Elections Law in 2009, guarantees the free expression of thoughts as long as "anonymity is prohibited during the electoral campaign via the global computer network". Paragraph 2 provides for a fine of R$5,000 to R$30,000.
When deciding to reinterpret the rule, Minister Alexandre argued that the dissemination of fake news, even when carried out by an identified person, has the same harmful effects on the legitimacy of the elections as the demonstration made by an anonymous user. Ministers Ricardo Lewandowski, Cármen Lúcia and Benedito Gonçalves accompanied the rapporteur.Although the special appeal is subject to preliminary ruling before the court of origin, the same does not happen with the appeal filed against the decision not to admit this appeal. Nelson Jr./SCO/STF Minister Joel Ilan Paciornik, rapporteur of the case at the Superior Court of Justice Nelson Jr./SCO/STF Thus, Minister Joel Ilan Paciornik, of the Superior Court of Justice, ordered the referral of a case to the court for the analysis of the admissibility of an appeal in a special appeal and annulled a monocratic decision of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro that had not been acknowledged of such grievance.